The Antibody Society

the official website of the antibody society

An international non-profit supporting antibody-related research and development.

You are here: Home / Archives for Bispecific antibodies

Targeting two receptors can significantly increase cell specificity

by

Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics, held in December 2021, offered many opportunities to hear exciting and informative presentations by experts in the field. We are pleased to present here a summary of a lecture given in the “Immune Cell Recruitment and Redirection” session by Dr. Jonathan Davis. The summary was kindly written by Dr. Czeslaw Radziejewski.

 


Targeting two receptors can significantly increase cell specificity.
Jonathan Davis, Vice President of Innovation and Strategy, Invenra, Inc.

Jonathan Davis presented a talk detailing Invenra’s rationale for generating bispecific antibodies that target two receptors at the same cell and provided some examples of their biological activity. The platform is based on the construct in which CH1/CL domain in one arm is substituted with a domain derived from CH3. This approach produces stable constructs that are easy to purify. The presentation focused on bispecifics referred to as SNIPERs. The idea behind bispecific SNIPERs is to combine two binding arms, both of which having low affinity toward their cellular targets. When both targets are engaged with cognate targets on the cell surface, the avidity effect results in much stronger binding. This approach could potentially address undesirable binding of monospecific antibodies to healthy tissues where tumor antigen is also expressed at lower levels.

Dr. Davis discussed the concept of symmetric synergy and asymmetric synergy. In the case of symmetric synergy both targets are present at about the same density, whereas in asymmetric synergy one target is present in much greater abundance than the other. According to the speaker, for the symmetric synergy to occur the two target molecules have to be in a right orientation, so the epitopes have to be properly oriented in respect to each other, at least most of the time. This necessitates screening large number of antibodies in order to build a bispecific that demonstrates good synergy. With good geometry fit, 100- to 1000-fold increases in affinity can be reached on cells. He cited the IL-2 receptor system as an example of asymmetric synergy found in nature. High affinity IL-2 receptor is a three-part system consisting of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits. The alpha subunit is present in high concentration, but binds IL-2 with low affinity. The alpha subunit with bound IL-2 binds to beta and then to gamma subunits to form a high affinity signaling complex. This process goes in one direction: from alpha to beta and gamma and that is why it is considered asymmetric. Dr. Davis emphasized that Invenra has the ability to generate and screen large number of constructs to select the right candidate for further development.

Invenra is exploring the SNIPER approach for Treg depletion and for the agonism of co-stimulatory receptor for T cells, OX40. In this lecture, Dr. Davis discussed the anti-tumor activity of SNIPER INV721 in neuroblastoma. The marketed antibody therapeutic, dinutuximab, targets disialoganglioside GD2 that is densely expressed on neuroblastoma cells. GD2 is also expressed on melanomas, small cell lung cancers and sarcomas. Dinutuximab causes lysis of GD2-expressing cells and its mechanism of action involves ADCC and CDC. The antibody is very effective, but causes excruciating pain in patients, presumably because the ganglioside is expressed in all tissues, albeit at the much lower levels. As a second target of INV721, Invenra selected the check-point molecule B7H3 (CD276) that is present only on the tumor cells. To reduce affinity for ganglioside GD2, some residues in the existing antibody against the target were mutated, which allowed the generation of SNIPER( INV721) that bound to neuroblastoma cells only if two targets were present, but not either one alone. To test the in vivo binding affinity of the bispecific antibody, INV721 was radiolabeled with 89Zr. Mice bearing GD2/B7H3-expressing tumors were intravenously injected with 89Zr-labeled INV721 and its in vivo biodistribution was monitored via positron emission tomography imaging. 89Zr-INV721- showed elevated accumulation in the tumor with minimal uptake in normal tissues. 89Zr-radiolabeled isotype control antibody displayed significantly lower tumor uptake demonstrating the specificity of INV721. (1) Dr. Davis indicated that one potential extension of the Invenra bispecific antibodies approach would be to convert these molecules into T-cell engagers.

1. Erbe AK et al. Specific Targeting of Tumors Through Bispecific SNIPER Antibodies. J Immunol, May 1, 2020, 204 (1 Supplement) 91.2.

Join us on April 7th for our next webinar, Precision Execution of Bispecifics at Scale from Design to Delivery!

by

Thursday April 7, 2022 11am ET / 5pm CET
Speaker: Dr. Lisa Prendergast, Associate Director of Expression System Sciences in Licensing at Lonza

Registration for our next webinar, “Precision Execution of Bispecifics at Scale from Design to Delivery“, is now open!

Novel therapeutic modalities such as bispecific antibodies are increasingly being explored as more effective alternatives to monoclonal antibodies for a range of diseases. Therapeutics such as bispecifics, can have a combinatorial effect by targeting two antigens,  resulting in treatments with enhanced utility, higher efficacy, fewer side effects and less resistance compared to mAbs.

Generating a bispecific antibody, which is correctly and stably paired, is a major production concern. Many solutions require significant changes to native antibody structure, which increases antibody complexity and forces adaptation of downstream processes. While a various platforms have been developed to mitigate Heavy-Light chain (HC-LC) mispairing, there are many other rate limiting steps for efficiently expressing these molecules in a CHO system. bYlok® technology is a design engineering approach that stabilise the interaction between the HC and LC, essentially removing the mispairing problem whilst retaining a more natural antibody structure.

This presentation will introduce you to a mechanistic review of the bispecific pipeline to demonstrate how a various tools and technologies can enable you execute bispecifics.  Case studies will be presented to show how the bYlok® technology can be used to stabilise and select for novel bispecifics from a panel of parental immunotherapeutic mAbs. Our data demonstrates that correct heterodimerisation can be achieved consistently and how standard downstream purification processes can be used during production.

Register here!

Clinical-stage ROR1xCD3 bispecific antibodies with potential for broad cancer specificity

by

Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics, held in December 2021, offered many opportunities to hear exciting and informative presentations by experts in the field. We are pleased to present here a summary of a lecture given in the “Immune Cell Recruitment and Redirection” session by Prof. Kerry Chester. The summary was kindly written by Dr. Czeslaw Radziejewski.

Clinical-stage ROR1xCD3 bispecific antibodies with potential for broad cancer specificity.
Kerry Chester, Professor of Molecular Medicine at University College London and CSO of Novalgen.

The leading molecule of Novalgen is NVG-111, a first-in-class tandem T-cell engager in single-chain variable fragment (scFv) format. One arm of NVG-111 targets a T-cell coreceptor, CD3, while the second binds to the tumor-associated tyrosine kinase-like receptor ROR1. ROR1 was cloned in 1992 from a neuroblastoma cell line. (1) The function of ROR1 as a tyrosine kinase is still poorly understood, although some studies show evidence of its intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. ROR1 is a cell-surface oncofetal antigen, expressed during embryogenesis and largely absent in normal adult organs, with only low-level expression on adipocytes, pancreas, and parathyroid glands. In contrast to the lack of expression in healthy tissues, ROR1 is present in a wide range of cancers and cancer initiating stem cells. It is expressed in both hematological malignancies and in solid tumors. (2)

ROR1 has three extracellular domains: Kringle, Frizzled and Ig-like domain. ROR1 sequences of extracellular domain (ECD) are highly similar between different species. For example, there is 97.6% identity between mouse and human ROR1 ECD. Many years after the initial ROR1 discovery, its ligand was identified as Wnt-5a, one of the Wnt family signaling molecules. Unlike other ROR1 clinical candidates under development, the anti-ROR1 arm of NVG-111 binds to ROR1 Frizzled domain.

Novalgen began the development of NVG-111 by immunizing rats with recombinant extracellular domain of ROR1. The majority of the resulting antibodies bound to Ig-like domain, none bound to Kringle domain, and only one clone (clone F) bound to Frizzled domain. Clone F was selected for further development. Using flow-cytometry, Novalgen demonstrated binding of clone F to a large number of human cancer cell lines. Clone F was humanized and used to format a bispecific scFv with humanized anti-CD3. NVG-111 binds to mouse and to human ROR1 with low nanomolar affinity, but the anti-CD3 arm does not bind to mouse CD3.

In preclinical studies NVG-111 was effective in in-vitro and in an in-vivo mice model of hematological malignancies, and it demonstrated the ability to kill solid tumor in an established PANC-1 mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic carcinoma. NVG-111 also demonstrated killing in models of advanced solid tumors. It eliminated CD44+/CD24- cancer stem cells in a solid tumor model of triple-negative breast cancer. It induced dose-dependent killing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patient samples where patient CLL cells were cocultured with autologous T cells with EC50 in the range of 4-100 pg/ml. NVG-111 showed T cell-mediated killing of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cells that was as effective as killing by blinatumomab, which binds CD3 and CD19, but with 2—30% lower levels of cytokine release (measured as interferon gamma) than blinatumomab, suggesting lower risk of cytokine-release syndrome. Toxicity studies performed in mice using AAV expressing NVG-111 showed lack of toxicity at levels 20- to 1000-fold of expected steady-state levels in clinical dose. Because over 90% of CLL/MCL patients are ROR1 positive, the current focus of Novalgen clinical studies are these two hematological malignancies. Importantly, ROR1 is not expressed on normal B cells, therefore risk of B cell aplasia is expected to be reduced.

1. Masiakowski P, Carroll RD. A novel family of cell surface receptors with tyrosine kinase-like domain. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(36):26181-90.

2. Yuming Zhao et al. Tyrosine kinase ROR1 as a target for anti-cancer therapies. Front. Oncol., 11:680834. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.680834.

FDA approves Vabysmo™ (faricimab-svoa) for ophthalmic disorders

by

On January 28, 2022, Genentech announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Vabysmo ™ (faricimab-svoa) for the treatment of wet, or neovascular, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Faricimab (RO6867461, RG7716) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and anti-angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) bispecific antibody derived from Roche’s CrossMab technology.

The approval was based in part on results from four Phase 3 studies in wet AMD and DME. The randomized, double-masked, and active comparator-controlled TENAYA (NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (NCT03823300) studies evaluated the effects of faricimab (6.0 mg administered at fixed intervals of every two, three, or four months) and aflibercept (Eylea®) (2.0 mg administered at fixed two-month intervals) in wet AMD patients. The primary endpoint of the studies, average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline through week 48, was met in both studies. The average vision gains from baseline in the faricimab arms were +5.8 and +6.6 letters, compared to +5.1 and +6.6 letters in the aflibercept arms, in the TENAYA and LUCERNE studies, respectively, demonstrating the non-inferiority of faricimab compared to aflibercept. The study also showed that faricimab’s treatment interval could be longer than that of aflibercept – nearly 80% of patients treated with faricimab were able to go three months or longer between treatments during the first year.

The 3-arm, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled YOSEMITE (NCT03622580) and RHINE studies (NCT03622593) compared the effects of faricimab (6.0 mg administered at personalized treatment intervals (PTI) of up to four months or 6.0 mg administered at fixed two-month intervals) to those of aflibercept (2.0 mg administered at fixed two-month intervals) in DME patients. The primary endpoint, average change in BCVA score from baseline at one year, was met, with faricimab again showing non-inferiority in visual acuity gains compared to aflibercept. In the YOSEMITE study, the average vision gains from baseline were +11.6, +10.7, and +10.9 letters eye chart letters in the faricimab PTI, faricimab two-month, and aflibercept arms, respectively. The average vision gains from baseline were +10.8, +11.8, and +10.3 letters in the faricimab PTI, faricimab two-month, and aflibercept arms, respectively, in the RHINE study.

Further details for the TENAYA and LUCERNE and YOSEMITE and RHINE studies were published in The Lancet.

The European Medicines Agency has accepted the submission of a Marketing Authorisation Application for faricimab.

Vabysmo ™ is the 2nd antibody-based therapeutic granted a first approval for marketing in the EU or US in 2022. Explore our searchable table of antibody therapeutics approved in the EU or US for details.

Bispecific antibodies come to the fore

by

Bispecific antibodies are a versatile class of targeted therapeutics designed to bind two different sites, which can be located on a single antigen or on two antigens. Although bispecific antibodies were conceptualized ~60 years ago, various challenges associated with protein engineering, stability and manufacturing delayed their wide-spread development. However, as of 2020, numerous validated platforms, i.e., those that have produced bispecific clinical candidates, are readily available (1). Using these platforms, the commercial clinical pipeline has grown to over 100 bispecific antibodies, ranging from tandem single-chain variable fragments (scFv) to full-length immunoglobulins with dual variable domains. Substantial growth in the pipeline has occurred only relatively recently, though. During the early 2010s, bispecific antibodies comprised less than 10% of the total number of antibody therapeutics entering clinical study per year, but this number rose to 25% by 2018. Reflecting the general success of antibody therapeutics, the entry of all types of new, innovative antibody candidates into clinical study also grew substantially during this period, from 63 on average during the early 2010s to over 140 in 2018.

As is the case for the overall pipeline of antibody therapeutics, the majority of bispecific antibodies that have entered clinical study recently are being evaluated as treatments for cancer. Among these, the most common approach involves guiding T cells to cancer cells via a bispecific antibody, which binds to a tumor-associated antigen on a cancer cell and CD3 on T cells. Bispecifics that use this mechanism of action comprise ~45% of the pipeline. Of the T-cell engaging bispecifics now in the clinic, B-cell maturation antigen is the tumor-associated antigen most frequently targeted, followed by CD20, CD33, CD123 and prostate-specific membrane antigen. Of the bispecific antibodies in the clinical pipeline that do not re-direct T cells, the most frequent targets are programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and its ligand (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The most frequently paired targets are HER2/HER2 (different epitopes), PD1/CTLA4, PD-L1/4-1BB, VEGF/Ang-2 and VEGF/Delta-like ligand 4. Immune checkpoint proteins are frequent targets, including PD1 paired with LAG3, ICOS and TIM3, as well as PD-L1 paired with LAG3 and CTLA4.

The increased number of antibody therapeutics in the commercial clinical pipeline is due, at least in part, to the relatively high approval success rate of these molecules. Since 2014, at least 6 antibody therapeutics have been approved in either the US or European Union each year, and the number of approvals in 2020 is expected to exceed that of the all-time high of 13 approvals set in 2018 (2). Overall, antibody therapeutics have a 22% approval success rate, defined as the percentage of molecules that successfully transitioned from Phase 1 to approval of all that entered Phase 1 (3). For each clinical phase transition, the lowest rates are for the transition from Phase 1 to 2 (69%) and from Phase 2 to 3 (45%). So far, bispecific antibodies are very similar to the broader category of antibody therapeutics in their Phase 1 to 2 (71%) and Phase 2 to 3 (46%) transition rates. Since so few bispecific antibodies have reached Phase 3 or been approved, there is insufficient data for the calculation of meaningful transition rates for Phase 3 to regulatory review and regulatory review to approval. Despite this, the favorable early phase transition rates are good news for bispecific antibody developers.

In addition to success rates, the length of time required for clinical development and regulatory review is a key drug development metric. Typically for antibody therapeutics, 4-6 years is considered a relatively short period, ~ 8 years is about average, and a period of 10-12 years is considered lengthy. As with success rates, a meaningful average development period for bispecific antibodies is not available because only 3 have been approved (emicizumab, catumaxomab, blinatumomab), and 2 of these are likely not representative of bispecifics currently in clinical development. Of the 3 approved products, emicizumab, a humanized IgG4 targeting Factor IXa and Factor X approved for hemophilia, proceeded through clinical development to approval the fastest (~5.25 years), and it is most similar in structure to a canonical IgG antibody. In contrast, blinatumomab took the longest (~13 years), and it is the most dissimilar to a canonical IgG, which is typically includes human or humanized protein sequence. Blinatumomab is a tandem scFv composed of murine protein sequence with such a short half-life (2.1 hours) that continuous intravenous dosing is required for efficacy.

Because most bispecific antibodies in the commercial pipeline entered clinical studies in just the past few years, marketing approvals, if granted, may not occur for at least 4-5 years. However, two bispecific antibodies, tebentafusp and faricimab, qualify as ‘Antibodies to Watch’ (2) with late-stage clinical study primary completion dates in 2020. Tebentafusp, which is composed of a soluble T cell receptor fused to an anti-CD3 scFv (4), is being evaluated in a pivotal Phase 2 study with a primary completion date in July 2020. Faricimab is a bispecific CrossMAb (5) targeting VEGF-A and Ang-2 undergoing evaluation in several Phase 3 studies with primary completion dates in September 2020. Tebentafusp and faricimab are being studied as treatments for uveal melanoma and diabetic macular edema, respectively. Results from the clinical studies, which will help determine whether the molecules advance to regulatory review, may be available in the second half of 2020.

In summary, bispecific antibodies are entering clinical studies in record numbers, with most developed for cancer. Data available to date indicates that these molecules have similar early clinical phase transition rates, and the potential for similar development periods, compared with canonical IgG antibodies. Data discussed here will be updated and presented at PEGS Boston in the “Clinical Validation of Platforms” session of the “Engineering Bispecific Antibodies” track on Friday May 8, 2020.

1.      Labrijn AF, Janmaat ML, Reichert JM, Parren PWHI. Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(8):585–608. doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1

2.      Kaplon H, Muralidharan M, Schneider Z, Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2020. MAbs. 2020;12(1):1703531. doi:10.1080/19420862.2019.1703531

3.      Kaplon H, Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2019. MAbs. 2019;11(2):219–238. doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1556465

4.      Damato BE, Dukes J, Goodall H, Carvajal RD. Tebentafusp: T cell redirection for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(7):971. Published 2019 Jul 11. doi:10.3390/cancers11070971.

5.      Klein C, Schaefer W, Regula JT. The use of CrossMAb technology for the generation of bi- and multispecific antibodies [published correction appears in MAbs. 2018 Nov 13;11(1):217]. MAbs. 2016;8(6):1010–1020. doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1197457