The Antibody Society

the official website of the antibody society

An international non-profit supporting antibody-related research and development.

  • LOG IN
  • BECOME A MEMBER
  • About Us
    • Our Team
      • Directors and Officers
      • Our Staff
      • Our Committees
    • Sponsors & Partners
  • Events Calendar
    • Current Events
  • AIRR Community
    • AIRR Community News
    • AIRR Community Newsletter
    • AIRR Community Seminar Series
    • AIRR Community Meetings
      • AIRR Community Meeting VIII – Decoding and Recoding Immunity
      • Zooming into the Community III
      • AIRR Community Meeting VII – Learnings and Perspectives
      • AIRR Community Special Event 2023  – Zooming in to the Community II
      • AIRR Community Meeting VI: “Exploring New Frontiers”
      • AIRR Community Meeting V: “Zooming in to the AIRR Community”
      • AIRR Community Meeting V Pre-Meetings
        • AIRR-seq in the Pandemic
        • AIRR-seq Biological Standards and Workflows
      • AIRR Community Special Event: “Response to COVID-19”
      • AIRR Community Meeting IV: “Bridging the Gaps”
      • AIRR Community Meeting III
        • Day 1
        • Day 2
        • Day 3
        • Day 4
      • AIRR Community Meeting II
      • AIRR Community Meeting I
    • On AIRR – An AIRR Community Podcast
    • AIRR Data Commons
    • AIRR-C Germline Database Resources
    • AIRR Community Publications
    • AIRR Community Working Groups
      • Biological Resources Working Group
      • Common Repository Working Group
      • Diagnostics Working Group
      • Germline Database Working Group
      • Legal and Ethics Working Group
      • Software Working Group
      • Standards Working Group
    • AIRR Community Sub-Committees
      • Communications Sub-Committee
      • Executive Sub-Committee
      • Inferred Allele Review Committee
      • Meetings Sub-Committee
      • Strategic Planning Sub-Committee
    • AIRR Community Webinar Series
    • AIRR Community Calendar
    • AIRR Community Resources
  • Programs
    • Conferences
    • Competitions
      • Huston Award
        • Huston Award submission guidelines
      • Research Competition
      • Science Writing
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
      • Upcoming Webinars in 2026
  • Business Intelligence
    • Antibody Discovery & Development
      • Antibody Validation
      • Commercializing Antibody Therapeutics
      • Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoires
    • Antibody News
    • Antibody therapeutics approved or in regulatory review in the EU or US
      • Antibody therapeutics product data
    • Antibodies to Watch
      • Antibodies in early-stage studies
    • Presentations
  • Learning and Career Center
    • Research Resources
      • Antibodies in late-stage clinical studies
    • Education Resources
    • Society Publications
    • Career Shorts
  • Members
    • Login
    • Note to members
    • Member discount codes
  • Sponsors & Partners
You are here: Home / Archives for Janice Reichert

NIH seeks community input on research approaches and priorities related to SARS-CoV-2 serology

May 20, 2020 by Janice Reichert

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) in partnership with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease is seeking community input on research approaches and priorities related to SARS-CoV-2 serology. In this Request for Information,  NCI seeks comments on any or all of, but not limited to, the following research topics related to serology:

1. Research about the relationship between immunity, recent infection, antibody production, and other immunological markers, including:

  • The role and value of animal models and in vitro assays for determining the relationship between antibody production and immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
  • The types and titers of antibodies that are important for immune protection and the mechanism of such protection.
  • Whether cross-reacting antibodies from prior infection by other coronaviruses confer immunity.
  • Whether antibodies to coronaviridae can cause immunopathogenesis (e.g. ADE).
  • Genetic or other host factors that could predict antibody production and innate or adaptive immunity.
  • Specific virologic factors that mediate the generation of effective host immunity, especially humoral immunity vs. cell-mediated immunity.

2. Clinical utilization of serological testing, including:

  • Design strategies for use in clinical trials and population-based observational studies that are optimal to address the most critical research questions, including biospecimen sampling/biobanking considerations as well as safety and ethical considerations.
  • Characteristics and performance standards needed for serological testing, whether for seroprevalence surveys or point-of-care tests.
  • Approaches to rapidly increase capacity for high-quality serology testing in United States, by leveraging existing infrastructure, especially for underserved communities.
  • How to use and interpret serological testing results safely, effectively, and equitably.

NCI is also specifically interested in the link to cancer across all of these areas, including but not limited to the characteristics of the immune response in patients undergoing treatment and cancer survivors; prediction of susceptibility to infection and outcomes in cancer patients; seroepidemiology in cancer patients.

Your comments could include any of the following:

  • Research approaches for these topics;
  • Innovative strategies to advance research progress;
  • Challenges to progress in these areas;
  • Emerging trends, advances, technologies, analytic strategies, and perspectives that NCI should consider in this planning process;
  • Potential approaches to gauge research progress and success.

Please comment on any other topic that you find relevant. Responses to the notice are due on May 26, 2020. 

NCI has posted a Notice of Intent to Publish a Funding Opportunity Announcement for components of the new Serological Sciences Network on May 15. The RFA is expected to be announced in June with expected application due dates in July. Awards are anticipated to be made in September 2020.

Filed Under: NCI Tagged With: National Institutes of Health, SARS-CoV-2, serology

Coronavirus in the crosshairs, Part 8: FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization of Therapeutics

May 13, 2020 by Janice Reichert

During public health emergencies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can allow use of unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by threat agents, such as SARS-CoV-2, when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. On March 27, 2020, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services declared that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of drugs and biologics during the COVID-19 outbreak, which gave FDA the authority to issue Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA).

It is important to note that FDA’s allowance of an emergency investigational new drug application or compassionate use of a COVID-19 intervention is not equivalent to FDA issuing an EUA, and EUA issuance is not equivalent to FDA approval.

Letters of authorization issued for therapeutics

To date (May 12, 2020), although over 90 EUAs have been issued for diagnostic tests of various types, only 3 EUAs have been issued for therapeutics:

  • Fresenius Propoven 2% emulsion to maintain sedation via continuous infusion in patients greater than 16 years old who require mechanical ventilation in an Intensive Care Unit setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. The EUA was issued to Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC on May 8, 2020.
  • Remdesivir to treat adults and children with suspected or laboratory confirmed COVID-19 and severe disease defined as SpO2 ≤ 94% on room air, requiring supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The EUA was issued to Gilead Sciences, Inc. on May 1, 2020.
  • Chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate supplied from the Strategic National Stockpile for treatment of COVID-19. The EUA was issued to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority on March 28, 2020.

Limitations to the scope and duration of the authorizations, as well as specific conditions that apply, are detailed in FDA’s letters of authorization.

Possible biologic candidates for EUAs in 2020

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to multiple pathologies, including inflammation, respiratory distress and abnormal coagulation.  Existing biological therapies that might ameliorate symptoms, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target inflammatory cytokines and proteins involved in clotting, have thus been re-purposed as possible COVID-19 interventions.

Although FDA has not yet issued an EUA for a biologic COVID-19 therapeutic, numerous candidates are in late-stage clinical studies that might yield results that warrant such an authorization in 2020. Of these, 5 (Sarilumab, Emapalumab, Tocilizumab, Siltuximab and Ravulizumab) are already approved as treatments for other diseases, and thus may be available for broad distribution if the sponsoring company chooses to pursue an EUA for COVID-19 and FDA issues the authorization. The logistics of large-scale manufacturing and broad distribution of other candidates may be challenging for the sponsoring companies.

Details of 10 possible biologic candidates for EUAs in 2020 are listed here in chronological order according to the estimated primary completion dates of the relevant studies:

July – August 2020

  • Sarilumab (Kevara®; Sanofi, Regeneron), a human IgG1 mAb targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), is approved for rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Sanofi and Regeneron are sponsoring an adaptive Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of sarilumab for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (NCT04327388). The primary outcome measure of the study is time to improvement of 2 points in clinical status assessment from baseline to Day 29 using the 7-point ordinal scale, and the estimated primary completion date is July 2020.
  • Emapalumab (Gamifant®; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum) is a human IgG1 mAb targeting interferon gamma  approved for treatment of pediatric (newborn and older) and adult patients with primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) with refractory, recurrent or progressive disease or intolerance to conventional HLH therapy. Sponsored by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, NCT04324021 is a Phase 2/3, randomized, open-label, parallel group, 3-arm, multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of intravenous administrations of emapalumab and anakinra (IL-1R antagonist) versus standard of care in reducing hyper-inflammation and respiratory distress in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure is treatment success, defined as the proportion of patients not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, up to Day 15. The estimated primary completion date of this study is July 2020.
  • Tocilizumab (Actemra®; Hoffmann-LaRoche), a humanized IG1 mAb targeting IL-6R, is approved for rheumatoid arthritis in adults, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, as well as treatment of chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced severe or life-threatening cytokine release syndrome in patients two years of age and older. Clinicaltrials.gov currently lists 42 studies of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients, with 12 of these Phase 3 studies. Only one Phase 3 study sponsored by the drug’s co-developer, Hoffmann-LaRoche, is now recruiting patients. The NCT04320615 Phase 3 study is evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The primary outcome measure is clinical status assessed using a 7-category ordinal scale, and the estimated primary completion date of this study is August 31, 2020.

September – October 2020

  • Lenzilumab (Humanigen, Inc.) is a Humaneered® mAb targeting granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Humanigen, Inc. is sponsoring the NCT04351152 Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study of lenzilumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation and/or mortality up to 28 days. the estimated primary completion date of this study is September 2020.
  • Siltuximab (SYLVANT®; EUSA Pharma, BeiGene, Ltd.) is an anti-Il-6 chimeric IgG1 mAb marketed for treatment of patients with multicentric Castleman’s disease. University Hospital, Ghent is sponsoring the NCT04330638 Phase 3 study  evaluating siltuximab, anakinra and tocilizumab in improving oxygenation and the short- and long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and systemic cytokine release syndrome. The primary outcome measure is time to clinical improvement evaluated up to Day 15. The estimated primary completion date of this study is September 2020. Preliminary results of a compassionate-use program (SISCO study; NCT04322188) sponsored by the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital have been reported. EUSA Pharma has exclusive rights to SYLVANT® globally. EUSA Pharma has granted BeiGene, Ltd., exclusive development and commercialization rights to SYLVANT® in Greater China.
  • Olokizumab and RPH-104 (R-Pharm International, LLC, Cromos Pharma) are being evaluated in a Phase 2/3 study of COVID-19 patients. Olokizumab is a humanized anti-Il-6 mAb and RPH-104 is a fusion protein that selectively binds and inactivates IL-1ß. R-Pharm International is sponsoring the NCT04380519 international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, adaptive placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of a single administration of olokizumab and RPH-104 with standard therapy in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients that responded to the study therapy in each of the treatment groups at Day 15. The estimated primary completion date of this study is October 15, 2020.
  • IFX-1 (InflaRx GmbH) is an IgG4 mAb targeting complement 5a, which is a component of the complement system that can trigger inflammation. InflaRx GmbH is sponsoring a pragmatic adaptive open label, randomized Phase 2/3 multicenter study of IFX-1 in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (NCT04333420). The primary outcome measure is the relative change (%) from baseline in Oxygenation Index (PaO2 / FiO2) to Day 5. The estimated primary completion date of this study is October 31, 2020.

November – December 2020

  • Ravulizumab (ULTOMIRIS®, Alexion Pharmaceuticals) is a humanized IgG2/4 mAb targeting C5 that is approved for treatment of adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Due to start in May 2020, NCT04369469 is a Phase 3 open-label, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenously administered ravulizumab compared with best supportive care in patients with COVID-19 severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary outcome measure is survival based on all-cause mortality at Day 29, and the estimated primary completion date of this study is November 2020.
  • Leronlimab (CytoDyn, Inc.) is an anti-CCR5 IgG4 mAb undergoing evaluation in two Phase 2 studies of COVID-19 patients. The NCT04343651 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leronlimab for mild to moderate COVID-19 and the NCT04347239 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leronlimab for patients with severe or critical COVID-19 have estimated primary completion dates of December 4 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Based on results from 10 critical COVID-19 patients who received leronlimab, disrupting the CCL5-CCR5 axis leads to rapid reduction of plasma IL-6, restoration of the CD4/CD8 ratio, and a significant decrease in SARS-CoV-2 plasma viremia.

Biologic candidates targeting SARS-CoV-2

In addition to re-purposing existing biologics for use as treatments for the symptoms of COVID-19, the global biopharmaceutical industry, as well as government, academic and non-profit organizations, are developing therapies that target SARS-CoV-2. Of the biologic candidates that target the virus, the ones most likely to be considered for EUAs in 2020 are those composed of plasma from convalescent patients. SARS-CoV-2- neutralizing antibodies in the plasma are expected to protect patients, and potentially uninfected people such as medical personnel, from the effects of the virus.

The plasma-based products could serve as a critical component of medical care until recombinant anti-viral biologics are available. The first recombinant anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are expected to enter clinical study as early as June 2020. The Antibody Society, in partnership with the Chinese Antibody Society, is maintaining a list of ~60 recombinant biologics that target SARS-CoV-2, including antibodies, a DARPin®, and fusion proteins. We will report on the progress of these candidates in upcoming installments of “Coronavirus in the crosshairs”.

Filed Under: Antibody therapeutic, Coronavirus, COVID-19 Tagged With: antibody therapeutics, COVID-19, Food and Drug Administration, SARS-CoV-2

FDA approves sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy®) for triple-negative breast cancer

April 22, 2020 by Janice Reichert

On April 22, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted an accelerated approval to Trodelvy® (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who received at least two prior treatments for metastatic disease. Sacituzumab govitecan is composed of an anti-TROP-2 humanized IgG1 antibody conjugated to the topoisomerase inhibitor SN38, which is the active metabolite of irinotecan.

The approval was based on the results of a clinical trial of 108 patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who had received at least two prior treatments for metastatic disease. In this study, the overall response rate was 33.3%, with a median duration of response of 7.7 months. Of the patients who responded to treatment, 55.6% maintained their response for 6 or more months and 16.7% maintained their response for 12 or more months.

The accelerated approval program allows FDA to approve drugs for serious conditions to fill an unmet medical need based on a surrogate endpoint, i.e., a result that is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit to patients. Additional clinical trials are required to confirm Trodelvy’s clinical benefit, and the FDA can remove the drug from the market if the confirmatory trial does not show that the drug provides clinical benefit.

Filed Under: ADC, Approvals, Food and Drug Administration Tagged With: Antibody drug conjugates, Food and Drug Administration, sacituzumab govitecan

Antibodies to watch in 2020: Will the pandemic cause delays?

April 21, 2020 by Janice Reichert

As regulatory agencies tasked with evaluating and monitoring the development of medicines, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have pivotal roles in the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, these critical activities have been added to an already substantial workload. FDA and EMA are continuing the ongoing marketing application reviews for drugs that are not COVID-19 interventions, and they will need to process new applications submitted throughout 2020. FDA and EMA’s distribution of work is particularly relevant to new antibody therapeutics because a substantial number of license applications for these drugs, none of which relate to COVID-19, are undergoing FDA or EMA review. In a recent statement, FDA offered assurances that their application review teams are focused on their work, but noted that they may not be able to sustain the current level of performance indefinitely.

In total, biologics license applications (BLAs) for 14 new antibody therapeutics (i.e., not previously approved by any agency for any indication) are undergoing FDA review. EMA is reviewing marketing authorization applications (MAAs) for 4 of these 14 antibody therapeutics, and MAAs for 4 antibody therapeutics that are already approved in the US.

New antibody therapeutics undergoing FDA review

The 14 antibody therapeutics undergoing FDA review are treatments for a variety of diseases, including numerous cancers, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, osteoarthritis pain, diabetes, thrombotic microangiopathies, Ebola and HIV infection. The drugs for cancer are:

  • Sacituzumab govitecan, anti-TROP-2 humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate for triple-neg. breast cancer
  • Belantamab mafodotin, anti-B-cell maturation antigen humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate for multiple myeloma
  • Tafasitamab, anti-CD19 humanized IgG1 for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
  • Naxitamab, anti-GD2 humanized IgG1 for high-risk neuroblastoma and refractory osteomedullary disease
  • Oportuzumab monatox, anti-EpCAM humanized scFv immunotoxin for bladder cancer
  • Margetuximab, anti-HER2 chimeric IgG1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
  • Dostarlimab, anti-PD-1 humanized IgG4 for endometrial cancer

The drugs for non-cancer indications are:

  • Inebilizumab, anti-CD19 humanized IgG1 for neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders
  • Satralizumab, anti-IL-6R humanized IgG2 for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders
  • Tanezumab, anti-nerve growth factor humanized IgG2 for pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip
  • Teplizumab, anti-CD3 humanized IgG1 for type 1 diabetes
  • Narsoplimab, anti-MASP-2 human IgG4 for hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathies
  • Leronlimab, anti-CCR5 humanized IgG4  for HIV infection
  • REGNEB3, a mixture of 3 human IgG1 targeting the Ebola virus for Ebola disease.

A first review cycle for the BLAs for all 14 should be completed by the end of 2020. Despite the pandemic, 2020 may be a record year for new antibody therapeutics approvals (potentially 17, including the 14 discussed here and the approvals for teprotumumab-trbw (Tepezza®), eptinezumab-jjmr (Vyepti®) and isatuximab-irfc (Sarclisa®) already granted in 2020, or more).

Antibody therapeutics undergoing EMA review

Like FDA, EMA is continuing to process MAAs for antibody therapeutics despite the increase in workload due to COVID-19. EMA provides monthly updates on applications for centralized marketing authorization for human medicines that they have received for evaluation. EMA’s information as of April 6, 2020, indicates that they are evaluating MAAs for 8 antibody therapeutics that, if approved, would be new to the European Union. These 8 are Belantamab mafodotin, Dostarlimab, Satralizumab and Tanezumab, which are also being reviewed by FDA, as well as:

  • Obiltoxaximab (Anthim®), anti-B. anthrasis protective antigen chimeric IgG1 approved by FDA for prevention of inhalational anthrax in 2016
  • Emapalumab (Gamifant®), anti-IFN gamma human IgG1 approved by FDA for primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in 2018
  • Moxetumomab pasudotox (Lumoxiti®), anti-CD22 murine IgG1 dsFv immunotoxin approved by FDA for hairy cell leukemia in 2018
  • Crizanlizumab (Adakveo®) anti-P-selectin humanized IgG2 approved by FDA for sickle cell disease in 2019

Other antibodies to watch in 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic might delay the submission of marketing applications for antibody therapeutics that are now in late-stage clinical studies. As documented by Kaplon et al. in ‘Antibodies to watch in 2020’, companies developing 5 antibody therapeutics for cancer (spartalizumab, 131I-omburtamab, loncastuximab tesirine, balstilimab, and zalifrelimab) and 5 for non-cancer indications (aducanumab, evinacumab, etrolizumab, sutimlimab, and anifrolumab) had previously announced plans to submit applications to regulatory agencies during 2020. The Antibody Society will continue to monitor the development of these product candidates and report on progress. Discussion of these antibodies can be found in the ‘Antibodies to watch in 2020’ paper.

Filed Under: Approvals, European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration Tagged With: approved antibodies, European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration

Coronavirus in the crosshairs, Part 6: Web resources

April 13, 2020 by Janice Reichert

The extraordinary scope and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic has elicited extraordinary responses world-wide. Companies, government agencies, academic institutions and non-profits located across the globe have mobilized teams to research the SARS-CoV-19 virus and COVID-19, conduct clinical studies of potential interventions that currently exist, and research and develop new interventions, including vaccines. To educate and inform, numerous organizations are also providing news and analysis of the pandemic. Importantly, much of this information has been made available free of charge. In Part 6 of our series “Coronavirus in the crosshairs“, we provide links to a sampling of websites that collectively offer extensive, and free, coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Global Distribution of SARS-CoV-2

Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center 
This website is a resource to help advance the understanding of the virus, inform the public, and brief policymakers in order to guide a response, improve care, and save lives. The site includes a global map and a map of the United States

The New York Times
This website includes analysis of recent news and maps of viral distribution.

COVID-19 Clinical Studies

A new resource for tracking COVID-19 clinical studies has been launched by Cytel. Funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global COVID-19 Clinical Trial Tracker is designed to identify any active interventional trials investigating treatment of COVID-19, regardless of clinical context.

Clinicaltrials.gov has one-click access to extensive information about hundreds of clinical trials associated with the key words COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 and 2019-nCoV.

Therapeutics and Vaccines in Development

The Milken Institute has launched a COVID-19 Treatment and Vaccine Tracker. Data can be downloaded as a PDF.

BioWorld is offering a list of biopharma products in development for COVID-19, including both therapeutics and vaccines.

Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society is maintaining the Regulatory Focus COVID-19 Tracker, which is a resource for information on COVID-19 vaccine development that is updated weekly.

The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations has published an overview of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. As of April 8, 2020, they had identified 78 confirmed active projects, with 73 currently at exploratory or preclinical stages, and an additional 37 programs that were considered unconfirmed due to limited data available. As the authors note, the range of technology platforms being evaluated, including nucleic acid (DNA and RNA), virus-like particle, peptide, viral vector (replicating and non-replicating), recombinant protein, live attenuated virus and inactivated virus approaches, is striking.

Scientific and Medical Literature

The New England Journal of Medicine is now providing open access to a collection of articles and other resources on the COVID-19 outbreak, including clinical reports, management guidelines, and commentary.

Science has made their coronavirus-related content open access.

Next in Coronavirus in the crosshairs
In upcoming installments of “Coronavirus in the crosshairs“, we will discuss diagnostic tests and preliminary results of clinical studies of small molecule and biologic drugs used to treat COVID-19.

Filed Under: Coronavirus, COVID-19 Tagged With: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2

« Previous Page
Next Page »
  • Home
  • Privacy & Terms of Use
  • About
  • Directors and Officers
  • Advisors
  • Sponsors & Partners Old
  • Mission & Activities
  • Join the Society
  • Membership Levels
  • Members
  • Login
  • Antibody therapeutics approved or in regulatory review in the EU or US
  • Meeting reports
  • Presentations
  • Contact

©2015 - scicomvisuals