The Antibody Society

the official website of the antibody society

An international non-profit supporting antibody-related research and development.

You are here: Home / Archives for Antibody discovery

Antibodies to Watch in a Pandemic

by

Broadcast Date: June 30, 2020
Time: 8:00 am PT, 11:00 am ET, 17:00 CET

The extraordinary scope and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic has elicited extraordinary responses world-wide. Organizations located across the globe have mobilized teams to research the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19, conduct clinical studies of repurposed biologics, and research and develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 biologics. Disruptions at companies and regulatory agencies, however, have raised concerns about the effects of the pandemic on possible approvals of non-COVID-19 antibody therapeutics.

In this webinar, Dr. Janice Reichert (The Antibody Society) will provide an update on non-COVID-19 antibody therapeutics approved so far in 2020, and those that might be approved by the end of the year. She will also discuss the ~ 140 biologics currently in development for COVID-19, which includes over 55 repurposed biologics and over 85 anti-SARS-CoV-2 biologics.

Additionally, Dr. Thomas Schirrmann (YUMAB) will present a case study of an academic and industrial consortium for the fast-track development of a SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapy. He will highlight the challenges of discovering and developing an antibody drug during the present pandemic.

A live Q&A session will follow the presentations, offering you a chance to pose questions to our expert speakers.

Speakers: Dr. Thomas Schirrmann and Dr. Janice Reichert
Date: June 30th, 11am EST, 5pm CEST.

Click Here to Register!

James S. Huston – In Memoriam

by

Post written by: Richard Begent, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor of Oncology, University College London

James S. Huston Jr, Ph.D., antibody engineer and founding President of The Antibody Society, died in Boston on March 25, 2020.

Jim Huston was a distinguished biophysicist and a pioneering antibody engineer; his creation of the single chain Fv (scFv) antibody was a seminal advance. These genetically encoded molecules could express the vast diversity of antibody repertoires, and could be used for specific target binding by themselves, incorporated into multifunctional molecules, attached to cell surfaces or applied in any number of formats relevant to biomedicine.

Antibodies with their multiple functions, including the capacity for specific binding to a range of targets, became practical pharmaceuticals with the advent of monoclonal antibodies as described by Köhler and Milstein in 1975. Genetic manipulation humanized the constant regions, making repeated administration feasible with widespread benefits for human health.

It was evident that the smallest target recognition moiety of antibodies, the variable region (Fv), if produced separately could be linked to many agents, conferring exquisite binding specificity. Since the VH and VL domains are separate in the native form of the Fv, they needed to be joined in a way that retained stability, the binding performance of the two components together, and appropriate flexibility.

Jim proposed doing this with one genetic construct that encoded a single-chain Fv (scFv) in which the VH and VL were joined by a flexible linker. The design issues were complex, but, consummate biophysicist that he was, he translated the requirements into a successful design for the linker. Working with colleagues at Creative Biomolecules, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, an sFv reactive with digoxin was successfully produced and tested. The report (Huston et al 1988) of this work has been cited more than 2,300 times.

scFvs are readily expressed on the surface of filamentous bacteriophage and have often been the basis for naïve human antibody libraries with potential for rapid selection of desired binders from diverse libraries of many millions. This technology can be used for antibody discovery and humanization, and it has been the foundation of many successful commercial ventures. Jim’s own work included the demonstration of scFv fusion proteins and the first scFv intrabody therapy for the neurodegenerative condition, Huntington’s disease, an approach that is now being investigated in Parkinson’s disease.

The scFv format itself forms the targeting basis of T-cell recruiting agents, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), the antigen binding moiety of CAR-T cells. A number of products based on these formats are already licensed for clinical use, while several others are in development. This is an important beginning, but the potential for further applications is great because of the diversity of antibody repertoires and the robust nature of the sFv format.

Jim graduated in Chemistry from the University of Michigan and was awarded his Ph.D. for work on the Fd fragment of IgG and its domains, supervised by Professor Charles Tanford at Duke University. After postdoctoral research at Stanford and Harvard Medical Schools, he joined Creative Biomolecules in Boston in 1983 where he undertook the original work on scFvs. There followed numerous publications and patents relating to engineered antibodies and their applications.

Jim was one of the first people to see the long-term potential of antibody engineering and recognize how broad the applications could be. His lectures on this topic gave a unique experience in that one sometimes seemed to be discovering the meaning of his data simultaneously with him. Those who had the privilege of working with him benefited greatly not only from his generosity, enthusiasm, intellectual rigor and encouragement, but also from his ability to advise wisely or find the appropriate expert. He took the mission of advancing antibody engineering to an international level by serving as the scientific adviser to the Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics meetings for nearly 30 years. Over time, he brought the antibody engineering and therapeutics community together at meetings in San Diego and elsewhere. His insistence that scientific quality and education were the principal criteria for the program resulted in progressive growth and helped to cement a culture encompassing academia and industry. Building on this, he co-founded The Antibody Society in 2007 and was the Founding President and Chairman, remaining a Board Member until his death. He shared the gratification of many that, after a long gestation, antibody engineering is proving so beneficial to human health, with the promise of much more to come.

Jim’s many friends around the world will remember his love of life based on a deep Episcopalian faith, his pride and joy in his family, and the fortitude with which he bore illness over recent years.

The Antibody Society will honor Jim Huston and his many contributions to the field of antibody engineering at our next annual meeting.

Coronavirus in the crosshairs, Part 4: Antibody therapeutics

by

The Antibody Society’s series “Coronavirus in the crosshairs” examines the ongoing discovery and development of COVID-19 interventions for broad use, including small molecule and biologic drugs, and vaccines. Parts 1 and 2 examined re-purposed small molecule and biologic drugs and new vaccines, respectively, while Part 3 focused on COVID-19 convalescent plasma treatments in development. The specific content of the posts is prioritized based on when the interventions might be available to either patients or healthy people, including health care workers. Re-purposed small molecule and biologic drugs are likely to be available first, followed by new vaccines and drugs.

In Part 4 of the series, we provide additional details about re-purposed biologics, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that are marketed or in clinical studies for other indications, that might ameliorate COVID-19 symptoms and that are already in clinicals studies of COVID-19 patients. We also discuss anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that are in preclinical development and may enter clinical study by the end of 2020.

As mentioned in Part 3, there is no current evidence from randomized controlled trials to recommend any specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, clinical studies must be done to determine the safety and efficacy of the agents when administered to COVID-19 patients.

Re-purposed mAbs in clinical studies

To date, nearly 100 mAb therapeutics are approved and currently marketed in at least one country. A number of these products have mechanisms of action that are relevant to COVID-19, although they are not anti- SARS-CoV-2 agents. Zhou et al. have shown that SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes, which become pathogenic T helper (Th) 1 cells and generate cytokines such as Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, GM-CSF. This environment induces CD14+CD16+ monocytes with high expression of IL-6, which accelerates inflammation. Moreover, Chen et al. reported that IL-6 levels were significantly elevated in critically ill COVID-19 patients, and the extremely high IL-6 level was closely correlated with the incidence of RNAemia. Taken together, these results suggest that mAbs targeting interleukin 6 receptor (IL-6R), IL-6 or GM-CSF, may potentially limit SARS-CoV-2-related immunopathology, and thereby provide more time for anti-viral agents to work.

Anti-IL-6R mAbs tocilizumab (Actemra®) and sarilumab (Kevara®).

Tocilizumab was first approved in Japan in 2005, and it is currently marketed for rheumatoid arthritis in adults, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, as well as treatment of chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced severe or life-threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients two years of age and older. Since severe or life-threatening cytokine release is part of the pathology of COVID-19, tocilizumab may help ameliorate symptoms of the disease. As listed on clinicaltrials.gov on March 27, 2020, 3 clinical studies of tocilizumab are recruiting COVID-19 patients and 2 additional studies are not yet recruiting patients:

  • Started on February 20, 2020, NCT04306705 is a retrospective study evaluating safety and efficacy of tocilizumab compared to continuous renal replacement therapy in controlling CRS triggered by COVID-19. The study site is Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China. The estimated enrollment is 120 patients and the estimated primary completion date is May 30, 2020.
  • Started on March 8, 2020, NCT04310228 is multicenter, randomized and controlled clinical trial evaluating favipiravir combined with tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19. The study sites are in China. The estimated enrollment is 150 patients and the estimated primary completion date is in May 2020.
  • Started on March 19, 2020, NCT04317092 is a Phase 2 study of tocilizumab in COVID-19 pneumonia. The study sites are in Italy. The estimated enrollment is 330 patients and the estimated primary completion date is in December 2020.
  • Due to start in March, NCT04315480 is a Phase 2 study of tocilizumab (RoActemra) as early treatment of patients affected by SARS-CoV2 infection with severe multifocal interstitial pneumonia. Patients will receive a single intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. The study site is in Italy. The estimated enrollment is 30 patients and the estimated primary completion date is April 2020.
  • Due to start on April 3, 2020, NCT04320615 is a Phase 3 study randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The study sites are not yet listed. The estimated enrollment is 330 patients and the estimated primary completion date is August 31, 2021.

Sarilumab was first approved in the US in 2017, and it is currently marketed for rheumatoid arthritis in adults. As of March 27, 2020, one clinical trial of sarilumab in COVID-19 that is recruiting patients is listed on clinicaltrials.gov and 2 studies are listed as not yet recruiting:

  • Started on March 16, 2020, the Phase 2/3 NCT04315298 study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The study site is in New York City. The estimated enrollment is 400 patients and the estimated primary completion date is March 2021.
  • Due to start in March 2020, the NCT04321993 Phase 2 study will evaluate sarilumab or small molecules as treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The study includes 4 arms: 1) Lopinavir/ritonavir; 2) Hydroxychloroquine sulfate; 3) Baricitinib; and 4) Sarilumab (200 mg subcutaneous injection once). The study sites are not yet listed; the study sponsors are based in Canada. The estimated enrollment is 1000 patients and the estimated primary completion date is February 2021.
  • Due to start March 26, 2020, the Phase 2/3 NCT04324073 study will assess an intravenous dose of 400 mg of sarilumab in a 1 hour-infusion vs the best standard of care. The study site is in Paris, France. The estimated enrollment is 180 patients and the estimated primary completion date is March 2021.

In addition, tocilizumab and sarilumab will be tested head-to-head in a Phase 2 study in COVID-19 patients that is not yet recruiting.

  • Due to start on March 25, 2020, NCT04322773 is a an open-label, multicenter sequential and cluster randomized Phase 2 study of the effectiveness of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors in the management of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The study has 3 arms: 1) single dose treatment with tocilizumab 400 mg intravenously; 2) single dose treatment with tocilizumab 2 x 162 mg subcutaneously; and 3) single dose treatment with sarilumab 1 x 200 mg subcutaneously. The study site is in Copenhagen, Denmark. The estimated enrollment is 200 patients and the estimated primary completion date is June 1, 2021.

Anti-IL-6 siltuximab (SYLVANT®)

Siltuximab was first approved in the US in 2014, and it is currently marketed for treatment of patients with multicentric Castleman’s disease. As of March 27, 2020, one clinical trial of siltuximab in COVID-19 is listed on clinicaltrials.gov:

Started on March 19, 2020, NCT04322188 is an observational case-control study of the use of siltuximab in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection who have developed serious respiratory complications. Patients in Cohort A and Cohort B are treated with siltuximab in a non-ICU and ICU setting, respectively. Each patient will have a matched control receiving standard treatment without siltuximab. The study site is in Italy. The estimated enrollment is 50 patients and the estimated primary completion date is May 19, 2020.

Anti-GM-CSF mAbs

No anti-GM-CSF mAbs have been approved, but 7 investigational mAbs with potentially relevant mechanisms of action are in clinical studies. Five target GM-CSF (TJ003234, Gimsilumab, Lenzilumab, Otilimab and Namilumab), 1 targets the GM-CSF receptor (Mavrilimumab) and 1 targets beta common receptor for GM-CSF, IL-3, IL-5 (CSL311). To date, companies developing TJ003234, Gimsilumab, and Lenzilumab have indicated that they plan on starting clinical studies of COVID-19 patients.

  • On March 13, 2020, I-Mab Biopharma announced that it is initiating the development of TJM2 (TJ003234) to treat cytokine storm associated with severe and critical illness caused by COVID-19. Discovered by I-Mab, TJM2’s development will start following the FDA’s acceptance of I-Mab’s Investigational New Drug application. Study sites will initially be in the US, with possible expansion into other hardest-hit countries. TJM2 was previously evaluated in a Phase 1 study of healthy adults.
  • On March 18, 2020, Roivant Sciences announced that it has engaged with regulators in the United States, Europe, and Asia to rapidly advance the clinical development of gimsilumab for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Gimsilumab has been tested two clinical studies, including a 4-week Phase 1 study of a subcutaneous formulation in healthy volunteers.
  • On March 27, 2020, Humanigen, Inc., announced that the company has submitted an initial protocol synopsis to the FDA in support of the company’s plans to initiate a multi-center, US, Phase 3 study in COVID-19 patients. Humanigen has already conducted two Phase 1 and two Phase 2 studies, including in patients with severe respiratory conditions.

Novel anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in preclinical development

Numerous organizations and groups have announced plans or progress in developing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapeutics. The race will go to the swift, in this case organizations that are:

  • Already experienced in anti-infective antibody discovery;
  • Adept at antibody design, engineering and selection;
  • Able to manufacture antibodies; and
  • Experienced in regulatory affairs.

If any of these elements are missing, then the organization must be able to quickly contract the work or engage a collaborator or partner with the missing expertise.

It must be noted, however, that a single product is unlikely to meet the currently very substantial medical need, and not all product candidates will be successful in clinical studies. Therefore, many initiatives aimed at developing investigational antibodies are needed.

The development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapeutics involves the following major steps:

  • Initiation of the discovery process using, e.g., transgenic mouse, display technology or human B cell from COVID-19 patient;
  • Identification and characterization of suitable antibodies via in vitro methods;
  • Non-clinical assessment via in vivo methods;
  • Manufacturing of material suitable for administration to humans;
  • Demonstration of safety and efficacy in humans.

Due to the severity of the pandemic, the pace of the process, which typically is quite slow, has been substantially accelerated.

As of March 27, 2020, early progress on multiple anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody discovery programs had already been announced. For example:

  • Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Ltd. and the Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are developing neutralizing antibodies derived from patients who recovered from COVID-19 as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The program will progress to clinical trials soon. According to a March 24, 2020 announcement, they have obtained neutralizing antibodies that can effectively block viral invasion in laboratory assays, conducted animal experiments, and are now verifying the preclinical toxicology and in vivo activity of the antibodies. An investigational new drug application, needed to initiate clinical studies, is in preparation.
  • Mabpharm Limited has generated a mAb-based fusion protein (CMAB020, STI-4920, ACE-MAB) that binds to the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Designed as a bispecific molecule, ACE-MAB has two functional arms: 1) a human antibody that targets the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 with high affinity and 2) a truncated ACE2 protein that binds to a different epitope of the spike protein. ACE-MAB is in the cGMP cell line development stage by Mabpharm Limited, and could be ready for large-scale production for human clinical trials and commercialization upon receipt of requisite regulatory approvals. Mabpharma and Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. have partnered in the development of ACE-MAB.
  • Vir Biotechnology, Inc., working with partners Xencor, Biogen and WuXi, has identified multiple human monoclonal antibody (mAb) development candidates that neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Two candidates will progress into human testing as soon as possible, with Phase 1/2 clinical testing planned for summer 2020.
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals has isolated virus-neutralizing, human antibodies from transgenic VelocImmune® mice, and antibodies from COVID-19 patients. From this large pool of candidates, Regeneron will select the top two antibodies for a ‘cocktail’ treatment based on potency and binding ability to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, as well as other desirable qualities. Regeneron aims to have an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody treatment ready for human testing by early summer.
  • James Crowe, MD, director of the Vanderbilt Vaccine Center announced that Vanderbilt University Medical Center, in collaboration with academic, governmental and corporate partners already have discovered SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The collaborators aim to have antibodies for human clinical trials by summer 2020.
  • Distributed Bio has identified thousands of anti-SARS-CoV-19 antibodies, and their scientists are currently working on  engineering, selection, screening and production of candidates.
  • Specifica has used its Generation 3 platform to select hundreds of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which are undergoing testing for neutralization.
  • YUMAB has identified antibodies that were proven to inhibit infection and lyse of live cells, and plans to initiate clinical studies after regulatory permission has been granted.
  • AbCellera has identified over 500 unique human antibody sequences derived from the immune cells of COVID-19 patients. AbCellera and Eli Lilly and Company have partnered to co-develop antibody products for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19.
  • Celltrion has identified a library of antibodies sourced from the blood of recovered COVID-19 patients in Korea. These antibodies are undergoing further screening to identify those that are most effective in neutralizing SARS-CoV-2. Selected candidates will form the basis of anti-viral treatment to be tested in preclinical and clinical trials in the third quarter of 2020. Celltrion also plans to develop a ‘super antibody’ that can attach and neutralize all kinds of coronavirus-related strains, enabling further protection against unforeseen or unexpected mutations.
  • Utrecht University, Erasmus Medical Center and Harbor BioMed have developed a human antibody, 47D11, that targets the a conserved epitope on the viral spike receptor binding domain and can inhibit SARS-CoV-2. Data show that 47D11 neutralizes SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 through a yet unknown mechanism that is different from receptor binding interference.
  • The lab of Xavier Saelens (VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology), in cooperation with the labs of Jason McLellan (University of Texas at Austin, US) and Markus Hoffmann and Stefan Pöhlmann (German Primate Center – Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany) have discovered a unique antibody that is capable of binding SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing a lab variant of the virus.

Other groups are also working on discovery initiatives. For example, the international research Corona Antibody Team, which includes the Technical University Braunschweig and European colleagues, is developing antibody-based therapies that target SARS-CoV-2. Details about additional biopharmaceutical product candidates in development for COVID-19 may be found here.

The Antibody Society will continue to monitor anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody development, and report on progress with these and other COVID-19 interventions in the next installment of “Conronavirus in the crosshairs”.

Photo by Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash

Molecular Biology Can Improve Antibody Drug Developability

by

Contributed by  Nick Hutchinson, FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies

The discovery and development of antibody therapeutics often adheres to a series of stages starting with target identification and progressing through lead generation, lead optimization, then testing in preclinical and clinical studies. Molecular biologists engineer antibodies during lead generation and optimization to improve a range of characteristics, including antibody specificity and potency, or to reduce immunogenicity and the rate of elimination from the body (1).

Next-generation antibody biopharmaceuticals include bispecifics, glyco-engineered antibodies and antibody-fusion proteins with complex architectures. While drug development scientists may use antibody engineering techniques to generate candidates with very desirable or improved functional properties, at the same time, these can alter the biochemical, biophysical and in vivo properties of the antibody candidate, which can be detrimental to the overall target product profile (2). Engineering antibodies to improve their functional properties is frequently performed without consideration for the subsequent developability, including manufacturability, of the molecule. These issues are then often identified at a relatively late stage in the discovery process, after substantial resources have been invested in the molecule and, therefore, can have a real financial impact on drug development companies that may be being kept alive by funding from investors.

Ideally, antibody therapeutics should be capable of being manufactured with high productivity and at high quality with low protein heterogeneity. From a developability perspective, it is preferable if they express to high titer from the mammalian cell expression system and are stable during production storage and delivery (1). Some antibody candidates can exhibit a propensity to partially unfold, revealing hydrophobic patches that are more normally buried inside the molecule. Once revealed, the patches can interact with one another, leading to aggregation. Other liabilities that reduce developability include low solubility, unstable amino acids, clipping and antibody fragmentation (1). These can be sufficiently severe that projects can be cancelled due to poor toxicology data and concerns around whether the candidate can be safely administered to patients during clinical trials.

One solution, advocated by investigators from Roche (2), is to assess developability during antibody drug discovery. Their workflow incorporates two separate assessments, the first following the initial candidate screening and selection and the second following humanization and re-engineering, but before the selection of the clinical lead. During the first phase of the assessment, complementarity-determining regions are analysed in silico for potential liabilities such as degradation sites. This can be followed by studies on stressed samples, with samples incubated at elevated temperatures for two weeks. Stable candidates can progress to the next stage or drug development scientists can use humanization and protein re-engineering to remove the identified liabilities. The second phase, which follows humanization, again employs in silico tools but evaluates the whole humanized molecule and assesses potential hotpots where post-translational modification, charge variations or degradation might occur. Researchers then perform a second stress test for the most likely or detrimental liabilities. During this phase, they can include tests for self-interaction and aggregation, such as apparent hydrophobicity by hydrophobic interaction chromatography, thermal stability by dynamic light scattering (DLS), protein-protein self-interaction by DLS and viscosity at high concentration by DLS with latex beads (2).

Other groups have gone further, and not only select for candidates with properties that limit manufacturing and storage risks, but also apply molecular engineering techniques in order to improve manufacturability proactively. For example, in 2019, a team from AstraZeneca described manufacturing challenges they encountered during downstream purification of an antibody that was undergoing liquid-liquid phase separation (3). This in turn resulted in the need for longer mixing times that can be damaging for proteins, yield losses, increases in pressure during processing and misleading analytical results from in-process samples. The team attempted to resolve the problem by optimize the bioprocessing conditions, but there were still substantial limitations to large-scale manufacturing. To fix the problem, they used in silico homology modelling and charged-patch analysis to identify problematic residues, and this ultimately lead them to substitute charged residues with those with a neutral or opposite charge. Their research showed that these substitutions minimized electrostatic interactions and allowed them to engineer a variant that maintained antigen-binding affinity, but eliminated the liquid-liquid phase separation behaviour.

The molecular engineering of therapeutic antibodies is allowing development of candidates with ever improved functional properties. However, researchers should consider, where possible, the impact of this engineering on the biochemical and biophysical characteristics of the molecule, which can have a negative effect on the developability of lead candidates. Incorporating screens for developability during drug discovery workflow can help eliminate candidates with liabilities that will prevent them from being successful drugs. The more sophisticated developers of antibody therapeutics are cleverly applying molecular biological techniques to improve the stability and manufacturability of their monoclonal antibody leads.

(1) Chiu, M.L. & Gilliland, G.L. (2016) Engineering antibody therapeutics. Current Opinions in Structural Biology, 38: 163-173.

(2) Jarasch, A., Koll, H., Regula, J.T., Bader, M., Papadimitriou, A. & Kettenberger, H. (2015) Developability assessment during the selection of novel therapeutic antibodies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 104:1885-1898.

(3) Du, Q., Damschroder, M., Pabst, T.M. Hunter, A.K., Wang, W.K. & Luo, H. (2019) Process optimization and protein engineering mitigated manufacturing challenges of a monoclonal antibody with liquid-liquid phase separation issues by disrupting inter-molecule electrostatic interaction. MAbs, 11 (4): 789-802.

The Antibody Society is an authoritative source of information about antibody therapeutics development. We are pleased to provide original posts and news summaries on our homepage, as well as semi-monthly summaries of recent news to our members.  Archived news from 2019 can be found in the Web Resources section of the Society’s website.

Everything you ever wanted to know about Antibody Validation

by

All webinars in our Antibody Validation series are now On Demand!

Tool antibodies are the dominant affinity reagent for proteomics in cell biology, reflected by the over 4.5 million antibodies that are commercially available. Distinct from therapeutics or diagnostics, tool antibodies tend to be poorly characterized. This is echoed by many reports of catastrophic specificity, activity, identity and reporting deficits involving such reagents.

Nevertheless, biological sciences remain highly dependent on them.

In a 10-part series, aimed especially at those beginning a career in biological sciences,The Antibody Society has invited leaders in antibody research from industry and academia to reflect on antibody validation. They paint a uniformly alarming picture of inadequacies at many levels – which encourages users to be highly aware of the consequences of inadequate tool antibody validation, which threaten their biological endeavors.

REGISTER HERE to view one or all 10!